Skip to content

Broker profile

PeopleLooker

  • Redact removes listings on paid plans

A people-search and background-report brand of LTVCO (The Lifetime Value Co.), a sibling of BeenVerified, sold on a $1 seven-day trial that converts to a monthly subscription. Reports pull addresses, phones, relatives, criminal and traffic records, property values and liens, unclaimed money, and social profiles across a claimed 120-plus sites. Its BBB file carries 77 complaints in three years, and BackgroundChecks.me, a site that names no operator, routes its searches into it.

PeopleLooker homepage screenshot

PeopleLooker overview

At a glance

Quick facts

Redact's exposure rating

Moderate
LimitedModerateSubstantialExtensive
Data published
Editorial estimate
Re-listing frequency
Editorial estimate
Complaint record
Pattern of complaints
Opt-out friction
Editorial estimate
Operator opacity
Fully disclosed
Prior data incidents
None documented

Our editorial assessment from public sources as of September 22, 2026. Each dimension is scored 1 to 4, higher means more exposure, and the overall gauge is their average, unless a confirmed breach holds it higher. It is an opinion, not a finding about the company's conduct or legal compliance. Dimensions marked "Editorial estimate" are estimated from the kind of service offered rather than observed on this site. How we score

What each dimension means
  • Data published: how much and how sensitive the personal data they put out.
  • Re-listing frequency: how quickly you reappear after opting out.
  • Complaint record: the volume and pattern of complaints across BBB, Trustpilot, and Sitejabber. No listing, or a listing with no reviews, counts against the broker.
  • Opt-out friction: how hard the removal process is to complete.
  • Operator opacity: how hidden the operating company and its principals are.
  • Prior data incidents: history of breaches or leaks of the data they hold.
Category

People search · background reports · property data

Operating entity
Parent family
BBB address

PO Box 105168, Atlanta, GA

Registered address

48 W 38th Street, 8th Floor, New York, NY

CA registration

"BeenVerified, LLC and its subsidiaries and affiliates" · 13 domains

BBB rating

B · not accredited · 77 complaints in 3 years

Pricing

$1 seven-day trial → $19.19-$23.99/mo

Opt-out

On-site form + email verification · ~24h stated

Routes searches here

Background

Background

Site history

PeopleLooker is one of the consumer brands The Lifetime Value Co. owns and operates, per its privacy policy. Search a name, phone number, address, or email and it assembles a report, then sells access to it by subscription rather than per report.

Operating entity
Registered contact

privacy@ltvco.com · 347-931-2725

Registered address

48 W 38th Street, 8th Floor New York, NY 10018

BBB address

PO Box 105168 Atlanta, GA 30348-5168

BBB file opened

March 31, 2020

The corporate picture here is refreshingly plain by data-broker standards. PeopleLooker LLC has its own BBB business profile in Atlanta with its own phone line, and peoplelooker.com is named on the California data-broker registration filed as "BeenVerified, LLC and its subsidiaries and affiliates" out of 48 W 38th Street in New York. Nobody is hiding who runs this.

That filing is worth reading closely, because it's bigger than most write-ups of this family suggest. It covers thirteen domains on one registration (beenverified.com, peoplelooker.com, numberguru.com, ownerly.com, neighborwho.com, peoplesmart.com, bumper.com, freephonetracer.com, emailfinder.com, moneybot5000.com, reversephone.com, wingmate.com, and famfinder.com), with privacy@ltvco.com as the single registered contact for all of them. One of the thirteen has since left the business, since wingmate.com now runs an astrology app rather than a people search.

The same filing carries 2024 rights-request numbers for all thirteen domains, and they're the most useful thing on it. It reports 31,905 deletion requests received, 19,791 granted in full, 11,512 granted in part, and 602 denied, with a mean response time of 10 days and a median of 3. That partial-compliance column is unusual (most people-search operators report granting everything), and it's the clearest signal available that a request here can come back half-done.

The $1 trial is the entry price, not the price. PeopleLooker's own offers page lists a seven-day trial at $1 capped at 100 reports with no PDF downloads, a three-month plan at $19.19 a month, and a one-month plan at $23.99 a month. What that page doesn't state is the standard rate the $1 trial converts to, so check the terms you're shown at checkout rather than assuming it lands on one of the two published plans.

Data Published

Data types

13 categories

Sensitive: elevated identity-theft, doxxing, or safety riskStandard public-record field

What PeopleLooker says its reports contain, taken from its own product pages.

  • Full names and aliases
  • Age and date of birthSensitive
  • Address historySensitive
  • Phone numbers and email addresses
  • PhotosSensitive
  • Relatives and known associates
  • Job and education history
  • Criminal and traffic recordsSensitive
  • Property records with estimated valueSensitive
  • Liens against propertySensitive
  • Unclaimed money by stateSensitive
  • Social profiles across a claimed 120+ sitesSensitive
  • Reverse phone and email lookups

Unclaimed money and property liens are an unusual pairing. Most people-search reports stop at contact details and criminal history. Adding a searchable list of money owed to you by state, alongside liens against your home, gives anyone running a report on you a financial picture as well as a locational one, which is the part that matters if you're worried about targeted fraud rather than about being found.

Contact

Contacts & links

Family and brand desks
Operating entity
Registered privacy contact
Brand privacy contact
Registered phone
BBB-listed phone

Use privacy@peoplelooker.com for anything the form can't handle. International requests and formal data-subject requests go to the brand address rather than through the search form. For a California Delete Act escalation, privacy@ltvco.com is the address on the California filing, so that's the one to name in a complaint.

Network

Related sites

The LTVCO family

peoplelooker.com is one of thirteen domains on one California registration. All but wingmate.com have a profile in this directory. BackgroundChecks.me, which names no operator and isn't on that filing, sells PeopleLooker memberships and routes every search into it.

One rights portal is filed for all thirteen sites. BeenVerified, LLC's California registration names beenverified.com/svc/optout/search/comprehensive_optouts as the page where consumers exercise their privacy rights across the whole family. In our August 2026 testing, though, each brand kept its own suppression list.

Use PeopleLooker's own form. The filing names one portal, but in our August 2026 testing each brand kept its own suppression list. Submit on PeopleLooker, then check each brand you can find yourself on and submit individually where you're still listed.

Three BBB entities, three cities. BeenVerified LLC files in New York, PeopleLooker LLC in Atlanta, and PeopleSmart's only BBB record sits under "Inflection" in Omaha. There's no single family rating, so a complaint count you read for one brand says nothing about the others.

Owned or operated by The Lifetime Value Co.15 entities in this network · Owner of BeenVerified + brandsExplore the full map

Reputation

Trust signals

Billing-led complaints

PeopleLooker has a real review footprint and it's consistently poor across every platform that carries it. The complaint mix is the familiar subscription-billing pattern rather than anything about report accuracy.

BBB (PeopleLooker LLC)Not accredited · 77 complaints in 3 years · file opened Mar 2020BAs of 2026-08
BBB customer reviews22 reviews2.05 / 5As of 2026-08
SmartCustomer (formerly Sitejabber)94 reviews · 76% one-star1.9 / 5As of 2026-08View reviews ↗
TrustpilotRead through a render proxy2.1 / 5As of 2026-08View reviews ↗
ComplaintsBoard7 reviews and 12 complaints · 0% resolved2.5 / 5As of 2026-08View complaints ↗

What reviewers and complainants say, from the sources above. Redact hasn't verified these complaints.

  • Charged after a trial the customer believed they had cancelled

  • Recurring charges continuing after cancellation

  • Reports thinner than the search preview implied

  • Difficulty getting a refund once billed

The BBB numbers here come from the complaint and review subpages, not the summary card. An earlier read of the profile returned 85 complaints and a 1.95 average; paging the actual lists returned 77 and 2.05. We publish the subpage figures because they're countable, and we flag the discrepancy rather than smoothing it. BBB's own totals drift between views.

The complaint categories are worth seeing in full. Of the 77 BBB complaints, 23 concern the product, 22 billing, 18 service, 7 sales, and the remainder order, delivery, and customer-service issues. That's a company whose customers complain about being charged roughly as often as about what they got.

Litigation

Litigation history

Still a defendant in New Jersey

PeopleLooker LLC is a defendant in its own right. Atlas named it in the first Daniel's Law complaint in February 2024, a case that went back to New Jersey state court later that year, and in April 2026 it was added to a Colorado cell-number class action in New York that the plaintiff dismissed four months later. The other two cases below were brought against the parent over PeopleSmart's $1 trial, an offer much like the one PeopleLooker sells.

Atlas Data Privacy Corp. v. The Lifetime Value Co. LLC

Remanded to state court Nov 20, 2024

Docket checked September 22, 2026.

Filed in Mercer County February 7, 2024 · Removed to D.N.J. 1:24-cv-04850 April 11, 2024 · Sent back November 2024

Court

Superior Court of New Jersey, Mercer County · MER-L-000272-24

Statute

New Jersey Daniel's Law

PeopleLooker LLC

A defendant since the first complaint

Federal judge

Harvey Bartle III

Daniel's Law gives New Jersey judges, prosecutors, law enforcement officers and their families a right to have their home addresses and unlisted numbers taken off sites like this one, and it lets them assign that right to someone else. Atlas Data Privacy Corporation collected 19,398 assignments and sued the LTVCO companies over them, with PeopleLooker LLC on the first complaint.

In April 2024 the defendants removed it to federal court. That November, Judge Harvey Bartle III ruled on forty Atlas cases at once. He found the federal court had no jurisdiction over 39 of them, this one included, and sent those back to the state courts, with only a suit against MyHeritage staying in federal court. The Third Circuit declined to hear an appeal on March 18, 2025.

The case was on Atlas's November 2025 list of 111 pending state suits. In January 2026 the companies' lawyers still listed PeopleLooker LLC among the defendants in a pending case, in a letter opposing Atlas's bid to have those cases managed together. New Jersey's Supreme Court rejected that request on May 1, 2026, and there's no published ruling on the merits that we've found.

Collins v. BeenVerified, LLC

Dismissed without prejudice Aug 2026

S.D.N.Y. · 1:25-cv-02577 · Filed March 28, 2025 · Ended August 11, 2026

Statute

Colorado Prevention of Telemarketing Fraud Act

PeopleLooker LLC

Joined as a defendant in April 2026

Judge

Analisa Torres

Bursor & Fisher filed this in March 2025 on behalf of Colorado residents, relying on Colorado's 2005 ban on knowingly including a person's cellphone number in a commercial directory without permission. The complaint said a people-search site showing Coloradans' cell numbers in its free previews does exactly that. It began against BeenVerified and the parent, and an amended complaint filed in April 2026 added PeopleLooker LLC and five more of the family's companies.

The judge set a new schedule for motions to dismiss in July 2026, but the plaintiff ended the case first. Its August 11 notice dismissed every defendant without prejudice, so the claim was never tested and could come back.

Bellanca v. Lifetime Value Co. LLC

Dropped by agreement Mar 28, 2024

N.D. Ohio 1:23-cv-02023 · Filed October 16, 2023 · Terminated March 28, 2024

Court

Northern District of Ohio

Judge

Dan A. Polster

Nature of suit

360 Personal Injury: Other · diversity jurisdiction

Brand at issue

PeopleSmart, per the complaint

Outcome

Plaintiffs' agreed voluntary dismissal, March 28, 2024

An Ohio right-of-publicity case against the family's parent company, pleaded around the PeopleSmart brand rather than PeopleLooker. Five months in, the two named plaintiffs dismissed it with the company's agreement, giving up their own claims for good while leaving the class claims open to anyone else. The filing doesn't say whether anything was paid, so we don't call it a settlement.

Heinz v. The Lifetime Value Co., LLC

Active

Docket checked September 22, 2026.

E.D. Cal. 2:25-cv-00949 · Filed March 26, 2025 · Open

Court

Eastern District of California

Judge

Dena M. Coggins, since early 2026 (first assigned to John A. Mendez)

Claims

Right-of-publicity statutes of California, Nevada, Indiana and Alabama

Brand at issue

PeopleSmart, per the complaint

Six people from California, Nevada, Indiana and Alabama filed this in March 2025, through the same plaintiffs' firm as the Ohio case above. The complaint says the parent used their names and details in PeopleSmart's $1 trial to sell subscriptions, a commercial use their states' publicity laws forbid without consent. The docket files it under fraud, but all four counts in the original complaint are publicity claims and the complaint never mentions PeopleLooker. LTVCO asked the court to throw out the amended complaint in October 2025, and the docket still showed the case open as of July 2026.

Apart from the cases above, we haven't found a lawsuit naming PeopleLooker LLC. Fresh searches also found no FTC enforcement action, no state attorney general or California privacy agency action, and no data breach or leak affecting PeopleLooker or the wider LTVCO family as of the last-updated date below.

FAQ

Q & A

Q & A
Who owns PeopleLooker?

The Lifetime Value Co. LLC (LTVCO), the New York company that also owns and operates BeenVerified. PeopleLooker's privacy policy says the site is provided by LTVCO acting through PeopleLooker LLC and is owned and operated by LTVCO. The brand has its own BBB profile in Atlanta and its own support line, but peoplelooker.com is named on the California data-broker registration filed as "BeenVerified, LLC and its subsidiaries and affiliates", one filing covering thirteen domains.

Does one LTVCO opt-out clear all thirteen sites?

Not in our testing. The California filing names a single comprehensive opt-out portal at beenverified.com as the rights page for the whole family, but in our August 2026 testing each brand served its own copy of that form on its own domain and kept its own suppression list, so a submission there suppressed BeenVerified rather than PeopleLooker. Use PeopleLooker's own form, and submit individually on each of the other brands you show up on.

What does PeopleLooker cost?

Its offers page lists a $1 seven-day trial limited to 100 reports with no PDF downloads, a three-month plan at $19.19 a month, and a one-month plan at $23.99 a month. The rate the $1 trial converts to isn't published on that page, so read the terms at checkout. Trial-conversion charges are the most common complaint on this brand's BBB file.

What's BackgroundChecks.me and do I need to opt out there too?

BackgroundChecks.me is a storefront site that says outright its searches route to PeopleLooker, and it sells PeopleLooker memberships directly. It holds no separate database of its own, so clearing your PeopleLooker record is what removes you from it. There's nothing to submit on the storefront itself.

Has PeopleLooker ever been breached?

Not that we can document. We found no breach, leak, or exposure affecting PeopleLooker or any other LTVCO brand, and no FTC or state attorney-general action against the family. That's a better record than most of the people-search category, and it's worth saying plainly rather than implying otherwise.

Take yourself off data broker sites

Redact scans data broker sites from your device. The free scan shows which of your details are exposed but hides which broker lists you; Premium and Ultimate show where each listing is. They also submit the PeopleLooker removal for you, re-scan about every 15 days and file again if your listing comes back.

Last updated September 22, 2026.

Court cases rechecked against the dockets and New Jersey court filings. PeopleLooker LLC is a defendant in the Atlas Daniel's Law case and was briefly one in a New York class action, the Ohio and California cases turned out to be about PeopleSmart, and the FTC, attorney general and CPPA searches were rerun. First drafted August 5, 2026 from PeopleLooker's own offers page, BeenVerified, LLC's California data-broker filing read directly from the registry CSV, the BBB profile and its complaint and review subpages, and third-party review platforms. Its opt-out pages bot-wall every automated reader, so the on-page opt-out wording is secondhand and labeled where used.

The page provides general information, not legal advice. Redact is not affiliated with or endorsed by PeopleLooker or any other company named here. Spotted an error, or represent this company? Email support@redact.dev.