Washington v. Intelius, Inc.
Enforcement actionWashington State AG · Settled Aug 2010 · Consumer-protection / post-transaction marketing
- Settled
Aug 2010
- Civil penalty
$1.3 million
- Theory
Deceptive credit-card charges / post-transaction marketing
- Plaintiff
WA Attorney General
The Washington Attorney General alleged Intelius enrolled consumers in third-party marketing programs and recurring subscriptions without clear consent during the checkout process. The $1.3 million settlement covered restitution and required changes to Intelius's checkout flow. The case is significant as one of the earlier post-transaction-marketing enforcement actions against a people-search broker - a regulatory theory later picked up by the FTC in the 2021 MyLife case.


















