Consumer Privacy Class Action v. LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.
ActiveU.S. District Court, Northern District of California · CIPA / Wiretap / unjust enrichment · MTD largely denied July 18, 2025
- Court
N.D. Cal.
- Claims
Wiretap Act · CIPA · invasion of privacy · unjust enrichment
- Motion to dismiss
Largely denied July 18, 2025
- Class
California consumers in RampID profiles
- Status
Discovery
The plaintiffs allege that LiveRamp aggregated consumer signals - names, addresses, phones, email addresses, device IDs, behavioral history - into comprehensive identity profiles (each assigned a RampID) without the data subjects' consent or knowledge, then sold or licensed those profiles to advertisers and other data brokers across its Data Marketplace. The complaint frames the resolution step (turning disparate signals into a single per-person profile) as itself an act of surveillance under the federal Wiretap Act and the California Invasion of Privacy Act. LiveRamp's defense argued it is identity infrastructure rather than a primary collector and moved to dismiss; on July 18, 2025 the court ruled the plaintiffs had adequately pleaded every claim except declaratory relief, dismissed that count without leave to amend, and denied the rest of the motion. The case is now in discovery. No settlement has been reached or announced.
















