Broker profile
A court-records search site that its own terms describe as wholly owned by InfoPay, Inc., the Boston company whose California data-broker filing lists thirteen domains. A name, phone number, email or street address brings up arrests, criminal and civil cases, traffic offenses, bankruptcies and liens, sold as single reports or as paid trials that turn into monthly subscriptions. Its footer says it can't vouch for any of it. Removal is a free form of its own.
Court Case Finder overview
Each broker is scored 1 to 4 across the six dimensions above; higher means more exposure, and the overall gauge is their average.
Court records · look-ups by name, phone number, email or street address
InfoPay, Inc. · named in the site's own terms
California data broker, through InfoPay's thirteen-domain filing
Single reports, or a paid trial that renews every 30 days
Free form · name and state search, slider check, tick your row
18,145 received by InfoPay for all its domains · 4,505 denied · 6-day median
No · disclaimed in the footer
Background
The owner isn't hidden. Court Case Finder's terms and privacy policy both open by calling it a public records service wholly owned by InfoPay, Inc., and InfoPay's California data-broker filing lists courtcasefinder.com, with Courtcasefinder among its trade names.
InfoPay, Inc.
13
Founded 2007 · over 10.5 billion searchable records
One brand on the same filing points the other way. IDStrong is an identity-protection service whose homepage advertises data broker removal, so InfoPay publishes court records under one name and sells help getting off data brokers under another. Court Case Finder's own opt-out costs nothing.
It looks official and isn't. The courthouse-and-laurel logo is branding. The footer says no government agency runs the site and that it can't guarantee its records are correct, complete or current. Its privacy-choices page adds that expunged or sealed cases may still show up.
Data Published
Drawn from the homepage, the footer's list of searches and the removal table.
Sensitive: elevated identity-theft, doxxing, or safety riskStandard public-record field
Contact
InfoPay, Inc.
Courtcasefinder.com 165 Middlesex Ave #1095 Somerville, MA 02145
227 Lewis Wharf Boston, MA 02110
Network
InfoPay's California registration lists thirteen domains. Next to Court Case Finder sit the court and public-records sites StateCourts.org, ThePublicIndex, CourtRecords.us and StateRecords, the people-search brands InfoTracer and RecordsFinder, PropertyChecker for homes, GoodCar for vehicles, IDStrong, EntityCheck, Sentinex and infopay.com itself. Each brand serves its own opt-out, and nothing on Court Case Finder says a request here reaches the rest.
Reputation
Reviews pull two ways. Two-thirds of Court Case Finder's Trustpilot reviews give five stars and nearly a quarter give one, on a profile the company has claimed and invites customers to.
A cheap trial that rolled into a monthly charge the reviewer says they never knowingly agreed to
Cancellation that reviewers say took a message to support
Refunds refused once a renewal had gone through
Cases the reviewer knew existed not found, or reports judged worthless
Litigation
Three class actions against InfoPay, Inc., which owns Court Case Finder, have reached federal court. The two complaints that are free to read go after the free search previews on its other sites, which show a searched person's name and details on a page selling subscriptions. Neither mentions Court Case Finder.
D. Colo. 1:26-cv-02375 · Removed from Denver District Court May 29, 2026
Six, suing for a proposed class
A scheduling order, August 19, 2026
InfoPay moved this one into federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act. Its complaint isn't free to read, so which site or practice it's about isn't known here. A motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction was filed on July 10.
N.D. Cal. 5:24-cv-03541 · Cal. Civ. Code § 3344 · Filed June 12, 2024
Withdrawn by the plaintiff two weeks after filing
One Californian sued over InfoTracer's teaser profiles, saying they put the names and details of people who don't subscribe to work advertising the site. It ended before InfoPay answered.
D. Mass. 1:21-cv-12061 · Ohio, Illinois and Indiana right of publicity · Filed December 16, 2021
InfoPay, Inc. and Intermedia Ventures LLC
Three plaintiffs, one each from Ohio, Illinois and Indiana, said StateRecords.org's free search results showed their names, ages and locations to sell subscriptions. The companies moved to dismiss. In July 2022 both sides told the court they'd agreed in principle to settle the plaintiffs' claims, and that September the plaintiffs dropped the case. No class was ever certified.
No docket on CourtListener names Court Case Finder or courtcasefinder.com, as searched in September 2026.
FAQ
InfoPay, Inc. The site's own terms and privacy policy say so, and InfoPay's California data-broker filing lists courtcasefinder.com among its thirteen domains. The filing gives a Boston address, the site's policies a Somerville one.
Don't count on it. The form removes only the rows you tick on this site, and nothing on its pages says the request travels further. The Court Case Finder removal guide links the walked guides for the rest.
Redact scans 120+ data broker sites from your device, finds where your details are listed, and submits the removal requests for you. If a broker relists you, it files again.
September 10, 2026 · The removal flow was walked in May 2026, and its six step screenshots were filed on May 20. Rechecked today against the live site and its terms, InfoPay's California filing, Trustpilot, the BBB and CourtListener. Contacts now match what the site publishes, the ratings are current, and a note saying no litigation existed gave way to the three class actions filed against InfoPay, taken from their dockets and the two complaints that are public. A registration number, other-state filings and data claims that couldn't be confirmed were cut.
